Compare Mowers
Prices are the recommended retail prices published by each manufacturer’s Australian site, in AUD, as read on the date shown on each model’s page; dealers set the final price.
A side-by-side reference of each model's stated specifications. MowerFacts doesn’t give opinions: where a published, spec-derived rule can separate machines we mark a Data Pick and show the rule; here, read the values and decide what fits your needs.
Best suited for
What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.
- Cox Stockman PLUS 40 in — residential: typical home lawns; 40-inch deck; gas powered
- Masport TTM102RH V-Twin — residential: typical home lawns; 40-inch deck; gas powered
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
- Stockman PLUS 40 in has a Hydrostatic with Auto Locking Diff transmission; TTM102RH V-Twin has a Rear - Hydrostatic Tuff Torq K46DR transmission. The transmission grade tracks duty rating and speed. Grade names are each maker's own and are not comparable across brands.
- Stockman PLUS 40 in has a 18 hp engine; TTM102RH V-Twin has a 19 hp engine, a 1 hp difference. Published horsepower is the maker's rating at a stated engine speed. It is a different measure from displacement, and two engines of equal rating can pull differently.
- Stockman PLUS 40 in lists at A$6,199; TTM102RH V-Twin lists at A$5,999, a A$200 difference. List price is the maker's own figure before tax, freight and dealer setup. Dealers set the final price.
- Stockman PLUS 40 in weighs 189 kg (417 lbs); TTM102RH V-Twin weighs 196.5 kg (433 lbs), a 7.5 kg difference. Operating weight bears on trailer payload, ramps and soft turf. On its own it says nothing about build quality. What Stockman PLUS 40 in's weight means for a trailer ›
- Stockman PLUS 40 in cuts from 20 mm (0.8 in) to 75 mm (3 in); TTM102RH V-Twin cuts from 30 mm (1.2 in) to 90 mm (3.5 in). The cut-height range is the shortest and tallest cut the deck offers. Most lawns are kept well inside it.
1 more difference, what isn’t comparable
Other verified differences
- Stockman PLUS 40 in has a published top speed of 5.6 mph; TTM102RH V-Twin has a published top speed of 5.5 mph, a 0.1 mph difference.
Not comparable
- Displacement: not published for TTM102RH V-Twin.
- Fuel Capacity: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
- Bagger Capacity: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
- Blades: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
- Engine Make: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
- Deck Construction: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
- Drive System: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
- Discharge: not published for Stockman PLUS 40 in.
Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.
Which is faster on your property? › Measure your lawn once and MowerFacts times all 2 against it.
| Spec | Stockman PLUS 40 in Cox · Riding (Lawn Tractor) |
TTM102RH V-Twin Masport · Riding (Lawn Tractor) |
|---|---|---|
| RRP (AUD) | A$6,199 | A$5,999 |
| Engine | ||
| Power Source | gas | gas |
| Displacement | 35.8 ci (586 cc) | — |
| Engine Power | 18 hp | 19 hp |
| Engine Make | — | Masport |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 |
| Engine Model | — | MVT500 V-Twin |
| Deck | ||
| Cutting Width | 40 in (1016 mm) | 40.2 in (1020 mm) |
| Blades | — | 2 |
| Min Cut Height | 0.8 in (20 mm) | 1.2 in (30 mm) |
| Max Cut Height | 3 in (75 mm) | 3.5 in (90 mm) |
| Deck Construction | — | Steel |
| Spindle Type | Electromagnetic Clutch | — |
| Discharge | — | Rear Discharge |
| Cut Positions | — | 7 |
| Drive | ||
| Transmission | Hydrostatic with Auto Locking Diff | Rear - Hydrostatic Tuff Torq K46DR |
| Ground Speed | 5.6 mph | 5.5 mph |
| Drive Tire Size | 15 X 6.00-6 (F), 18 X 8.5 (R) | 18" x 8.5 - 8 |
| Reverse Speed | — | 2.8 mph |
| Drive System | — | V-Belt |
| Dimensions | ||
| Weight | 417 lbs (189 kg) | 433 lbs (196.5 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 2 gal (7.5 L) |
| Commercial / Pro | ||
| Frame Construction | Fabricated Steel | Steel |
| Seat Type | Premium Highback Seat with Springs | Adjustable with high back |
| General | ||
| Bagger Capacity | — | 7 bu (245 L) |
Where these models differ, explained
Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.