Compare Mowers
Prices are the recommended retail prices published by each manufacturer’s Australian site, in AUD, as read on the date shown on each model’s page; dealers set the final price.
A side-by-side reference of each model's stated specifications. MowerFacts doesn’t give opinions: where a published, spec-derived rule can separate machines we mark a Data Pick and show the rule; here, read the values and decide what fits your needs.
Best suited for
What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.
- Masport TTM102RH V-Twin — residential: typical home lawns; 40-inch deck; gas powered
- Husqvarna TS 216 Tm — residential: typical home lawns; 43-inch deck; gas powered
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
- TTM102RH V-Twin uses a Masport engine; TS 216 Tm uses a Husqvarna engine. The engine maker builds the engine; the mower maker chooses the model, rating and fit, so the badge alone does not settle output or longevity.
- TTM102RH V-Twin has a Rear - Hydrostatic Tuff Torq K46DR transmission; TS 216 Tm has a Hydrostatic transmission. The transmission grade tracks duty rating and speed. Grade names are each maker's own and are not comparable across brands.
- TTM102RH V-Twin has a 19 hp engine; TS 216 Tm has a 21.5 hp engine, a 2.5 hp difference. Published horsepower is the maker's rating at a stated engine speed. It is a different measure from displacement, and two engines of equal rating can pull differently.
- TTM102RH V-Twin has a published top speed of 5.5 mph; TS 216 Tm has a published top speed of 6.2 mph, a 0.7 mph difference. Top speed is the maker's maximum in transport. Mowing speed is lower and depends on grass, terrain and the deck.
- TTM102RH V-Twin has a 1,020 mm (40.2 in) deck; TS 216 Tm has a 1,080 mm (42.5 in) deck, a 60 mm difference. Deck width sets how much grass each pass covers. Mowing time also depends on ground speed, turns and obstacles, so a wider deck alone does not fix the job's length. Time both decks on your own lawn ›
calculated figures and what isn’t comparable
Calculated by MowerFacts
- TTM102RH V-Twin works out to 0.72 ha/hour; TS 216 Tm works out to 0.86 ha/hour, a 0.15 ha/hour difference. Calculated by MowerFacts from deck width and the published top speed at 80% efficiency; it is not a manufacturer figure, and real mowing is slower.
Not comparable
- Displacement: not published for TTM102RH V-Twin.
- Weight: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Fuel Capacity: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Bagger Capacity: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Blades: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Fuel Type: not published for TTM102RH V-Twin.
- Deck Construction: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Drive System: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Discharge: not published for TS 216 Tm.
- Cut height range: not published for TS 216 Tm.
Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.
Which is faster on your property? › Measure your lawn once and MowerFacts times all 2 against it.
| Spec | TTM102RH V-Twin Masport · Riding (Lawn Tractor) |
TS 216 Tm Husqvarna · Riding (Lawn Tractor) |
|---|---|---|
| RRP (AUD) | A$5,999 | A$5,999 |
| Engine | ||
| Power Source | gas | gas |
| Displacement | — | 38.8 ci (635 cc) |
| Engine Power | 19 hp | 21.5 hp |
| Engine Make | Masport | Husqvarna |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 |
| Engine Model | MVT500 V-Twin | HV 635E |
| Fuel Type | — | Petrol |
| Deck | ||
| Cutting Width | 40.2 in (1020 mm) | 42.5 in (1080 mm) |
| Blades | 2 | — |
| Min Cut Height | 1.2 in (30 mm) | — |
| Max Cut Height | 3.5 in (90 mm) | — |
| Deck Construction | Steel | — |
| Anti-Scalp Rollers | — | Yes |
| Discharge | Rear Discharge | — |
| Cut Positions | 7 | — |
| Drive | ||
| Transmission | Rear - Hydrostatic Tuff Torq K46DR | Hydrostatic |
| Ground Speed | 5.5 mph | 6.2 mph |
| Drive Tire Size | 18" x 8.5 - 8 | — |
| Reverse Speed | 2.8 mph | 3.7 mph |
| Drive System | V-Belt | — |
| Dimensions | ||
| Weight | 433 lbs (196.5 kg) | — |
| Fuel Capacity | 2 gal (7.5 L) | — |
| Length | — | 79.9 in (2029 mm) |
| Height | — | 44.3 in (1124 mm) |
| Commercial / Pro | ||
| Frame Construction | Steel | — |
| Seat Type | Adjustable with high back | Comfort |
| General | ||
| Bagger Capacity | 7 bu (245 L) | — |
Where these models differ, explained
Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.