MowerFacts
Home › Compare

Compare Mowers

These mowers are in different classes — showing only attributes they share.

List prices are the manufacturer’s published figures, re-checked daily; they exclude tax, freight and dealer setup.

A side-by-side reference of each model's stated specifications. MowerFacts doesn’t give opinions: where a published, spec-derived rule can separate machines we mark a Data Pick and show the rule; here, read the values and decide what fits your needs.

Best suited for

What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.

  • Ariens APEX 60 KAWASAKI — prosumer: larger home properties and light acreage; 60-inch deck; gas powered
  • Cub Cadet PRO X 654 — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 54-inch deck; gas powered
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
  1. APEX 60 KAWASAKI lists at $6,099; PRO X 654 lists at $11,199, a $5,100 difference. List price is the maker's own figure before tax, freight and dealer setup. Dealers set the final price.
  2. APEX 60 KAWASAKI holds 5.1 gal (19.3 L) of fuel; PRO X 654 holds 7.5 gal (28.4 L) of fuel, a 2.4 gal difference. Tank size bounds how long a machine runs between stops. Consumption varies with engine, load and speed, so hours per tank are not fixed.
  3. APEX 60 KAWASAKI weighs 845 lbs (383.3 kg); PRO X 654 weighs 1,080 lbs (489.9 kg), a 235 lbs difference. Operating weight bears on trailer payload, ramps and soft turf. On its own it says nothing about build quality. What APEX 60 KAWASAKI's weight means for a trailer ›
  4. APEX 60 KAWASAKI has a published top speed of 8 mph; PRO X 654 has a published top speed of 10 mph, a 2 mph difference. Top speed is the maker's maximum in transport. Mowing speed is lower and depends on grass, terrain and the deck.
  5. APEX 60 KAWASAKI has a 60 in (1,524 mm) deck; PRO X 654 has a 54 in (1,372 mm) deck, a 6 in difference. Deck width sets how much grass each pass covers. Mowing time also depends on ground speed, turns and obstacles, so a wider deck alone does not fix the job's length. Time both decks on your own lawn ›
2 more differences, calculated figures

Other verified differences

  • APEX 60 KAWASAKI has a 44.3 ci (726 cc) engine; PRO X 654 has a 52 ci (852 cc) engine, a 7.7 ci difference.
  • APEX 60 KAWASAKI has a 24 hp engine; PRO X 654 has a 25.5 hp engine, a 1.5 hp difference.

Calculated by MowerFacts

  • APEX 60 KAWASAKI works out to 3.9 acres/hour; PRO X 654 works out to 4.4 acres/hour, a 0.5 acres/hour difference. Calculated by MowerFacts from deck width and the published top speed at 80% efficiency; it is not a manufacturer figure, and real mowing is slower.

Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.

Which is faster on your property? › Measure your lawn once and MowerFacts times all 2 against it.

Add another (2 more fit): every zero-turn mower · more Ariens · more Cub Cadet
Side-by-side specifications: Ariens APEX 60 KAWASAKI vs Cub Cadet PRO X 654
Spec APEX 60 KAWASAKI
Ariens · Zero-Turn
PRO X 654
Cub Cadet · Commercial
List price $6,099$11,199
Engine
Power Source gas gas
Displacement 44.3 ci (726 cc) 52 ci (852 cc)
Engine Power 24 hp 25.5 hp
Engine Make Kawasaki® FR730V Kawasaki®
Deck
Cutting Width 60 in (1524 mm) 54 in (1372 mm)
Blades 3 3
Drive
Transmission Hydrostatic 12cc Hydro-Gear® pumps / 240cc Parker® wheel motors
Ground Speed 8 mph 10 mph
Reverse Speed 4 mph 5 mph
Dimensions
Weight 845 lbs (383.3 kg) 1080 lbs (489.9 kg)
Fuel Capacity 5.1 gal (19.3 L) 7.5 gal (28.4 L)

APEX 60 KAWASAKI: Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — ariens.com.

PRO X 654: Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — cubcadet.com.

Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.

Suggest a correction