MowerFacts
Home › Australia › Compare

Compare Mowers

Prices are the recommended retail prices published by each manufacturer’s Australian site, in AUD, as read on the date shown on each model’s page; dealers set the final price.

A side-by-side reference of each model's stated specifications. MowerFacts doesn’t give opinions: where a published, spec-derived rule can separate machines we mark a Data Pick and show the rule; here, read the values and decide what fits your needs.

Best suited for

What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.

  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 — residential: typical home lawns; 9-inch deck; battery (no fuel or engine maintenance)
  • Mammotion YUKA 2000 — residential: typical home lawns; 13-inch deck; battery (no fuel or engine maintenance)
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
  1. Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 has a 220 mm (8.7 in) deck; YUKA 2000 has a 320 mm (12.6 in) deck, a 100 mm difference. Deck width sets how much grass each pass covers. Mowing time also depends on ground speed, turns and obstacles, so a wider deck alone does not fix the job's length. Time both decks on your own lawn ›
  2. Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 is rated for slopes to 30%; YUKA 2000 is rated for slopes to 45%, a 15 points difference. The slope rating is the maker's limit for safe operation, not a measure of performance.
  3. Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 cuts from 30 mm (1.2 in) to 60 mm (2.4 in); YUKA 2000 cuts from 20 mm (0.8 in) to 90 mm (3.5 in). The cut-height range is the shortest and tallest cut the deck offers. Most lawns are kept well inside it.
  4. Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 weighs 14.3 kg (32 lbs); YUKA 2000 weighs 16.4 kg (36 lbs), a 2.1 kg difference. Operating weight bears on trailer payload, ramps and soft turf. On its own it says nothing about build quality. What Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2's weight means for a trailer ›
  5. Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 is rated for 1,800 m² (0.44 ac) of lawn; YUKA 2000 is rated for 2,000 m² (0.49 ac) of lawn, a 200 m² difference. The rated lawn area is the maker's figure under its own test conditions. Obstacles, slopes and complex shapes reduce it.
2 more differences, what isn’t comparable

Other verified differences

  • Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 ships with a 5 Ah battery; YUKA 2000 ships with a 4.5 Ah battery, a 0.5 Ah difference.
  • Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 lists at A$2,799; YUKA 2000 lists at A$2,699, a A$100 difference.

Not comparable

  • Voltage: not published for YUKA 2000.
  • Run Time: not published for Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2.
  • Warranty: not published for Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2.
  • Fuel Type: not published for YUKA 2000.

Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.

Which is faster on your property? › Measure your lawn once and MowerFacts times all 2 against it.

Add another (2 more fit): every robotic mower sold in Australia · more Worx · more Mammotion
Side-by-side specifications: Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2 vs Mammotion YUKA 2000
Spec Landroid Vision Cloud 1800 m2
Worx · Robotic
YUKA 2000
Mammotion · Robotic
RRP (AUD) A$2,799A$2,699
Engine
Power Source battery battery
Fuel Type Li-ion —
Electrical
Voltage 240 V —
Battery Capacity 5 Ah 4.5 Ah
Motor Power — 88 W
Deck
Cutting Width 8.7 in (220 mm) 12.6 in (320 mm)
Min Cut Height 1.2 in (30 mm) 0.8 in (20 mm)
Max Cut Height 2.4 in (60 mm) 3.5 in (90 mm)
Drive
Drive Type — RWD
Dimensions
Weight 32 lbs (14.3 kg) 36 lbs (16.4 kg)
Width 20.9 in (532 mm) —
Length 24.2 in (614 mm) —
Height 11.1 in (283 mm) —
Robotic
Work Area 1800 ft2 2000 ft2
Max Slope 30 pct 45 pct
Navigation — NetRTK + Dual Camera AI Vision
Run Time — 65 min
Charge Time 100 min 100 min
Rain Sensor Yes —
General
Warranty — 3 yr

Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.

Suggest a correction