MowerFacts
Home › Compare › Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) vs Turf Tiger II

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) vs Scag Turf Tiger II

A side-by-side spec reference for two commercial machines. Where computed productivity separates them, the faster machine is marked a Data Pick with the arithmetic shown — the tables lay out each model's stated specs so you can match a machine to your property and routes.

A side-by-side for the commercial mower Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) and the zero-turn mower Scag Turf Tiger II. Open the full spec table in the compare tool ›

Best suited for

What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.

  • Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 60-inch deck
  • Scag Turf Tiger II — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 52-inch deck
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
  1. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) has a 60 in (1,524 mm) deck; Turf Tiger II has a 52 in (1,321 mm) deck, a 8 in difference. Deck width sets how much grass each pass covers. Mowing time also depends on ground speed, turns and obstacles, so a wider deck alone does not fix the job's length. Time both decks on your own lawn ›
  2. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) weighs 1,200 lbs (544.3 kg); Turf Tiger II weighs 1,418 lbs (643.2 kg), a 218 lbs difference. Operating weight bears on trailer payload, ramps and soft turf. On its own it says nothing about build quality. What Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801)'s weight means for a trailer ›
  3. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) has a 52 ci (852 cc) engine; Turf Tiger II has a 45.6 ci (747 cc) engine, a 6.4 ci difference. Displacement is the engine's size, not its output. A larger engine is not necessarily a more powerful one.
  4. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) has a published top speed of 11.5 mph; Turf Tiger II has a published top speed of 12 mph, a 0.5 mph difference. Top speed is the maker's maximum in transport. Mowing speed is lower and depends on grass, terrain and the deck.
  5. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) cuts from 1 in (25 mm) to 5.5 in (140 mm); Turf Tiger II cuts from 1.5 in (38 mm) to 6 in (152 mm). The cut-height range is the shortest and tallest cut the deck offers. Most lawns are kept well inside it.
calculated figures

Calculated by MowerFacts

  • Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) works out to 5.6 acres/hour; Turf Tiger II works out to 5.0 acres/hour, a 0.5 acres/hour difference. Calculated by MowerFacts from deck width and the published top speed at 80% efficiency; it is not a manufacturer figure, and real mowing is slower.

Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.

Productivity

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) vs Scag Turf Tiger II — productivity
MeasureLazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801)Turf Tiger II
Cutting deck60 in52 in
Ground speed11.5 mph12 mph
Acres/hr (80%)3.93.53
Acres/hr (100%)6.976.3
List price $16,899 $16,999–$25,399

Acres/hour computed from deck width and ground speed; 80% accounts for turns, overlap and trimming. Calculator ›

Components

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) vs Scag Turf Tiger II — components
ComponentLazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801)Turf Tiger II
Engine makeKawasaki® FX801VKohler®Command PRO®EFI– electronic fuel injection
Displacement852 cc747 cc
Engine power25.5 hp26 hp
Transmissionnot specified by manufacturernot specified by manufacturer
Drive typenot specified by manufacturernot specified by manufacturer

Ownership & dimensions

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) vs Scag Turf Tiger II — ownership and dimensions
SpecLazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801)Turf Tiger II
Weight544.31 kg643.19 kg
Fuel capacity45.42 L45.42 L
Warrantynot specified by manufacturernot specified by manufacturer
Dimensions (L×W×H mm) 2187 × 1646 × 1791 not specified by manufacturer

Dealer network and dimensions not in our data are shown as "not specified by manufacturer." See the full spec sheet on each model page.

Alternatives to cross-shop

FAQ

Is the Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) or the Scag Turf Tiger II better?

MowerFacts is a spec reference, not a review — we don't crown a winner. The Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) and Scag Turf Tiger II are both commercial machines with their own deck widths, engines and dimensions; the tables below lay out each spec side by side so you can match a machine to your property and routes.

How many acres per hour can the Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) and Scag Turf Tiger II mow?

At 80% efficiency the Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801) (60-in deck at 11.5 mph) covers about 3.9 acres/hour and the Scag Turf Tiger II (52-in deck at 12 mph) about 3.53 acres/hour, before trimming and trailering time.

← All pro head-to-heads · Full spec comparison →

Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 60 in 801): Specs verified against the retailer listing on Jun 6, 2026 — howardbrothers.com.

Turf Tiger II: Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — scag.com.

Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.

Suggest a correction