MowerFacts
Home › Compare

Compare Mowers

List prices are the manufacturer’s published figures, re-checked daily; they exclude tax, freight and dealer setup.

A side-by-side reference of each model's stated specifications. MowerFacts doesn’t give opinions: where a published, spec-derived rule can separate machines we mark a Data Pick and show the rule; here, read the values and decide what fits your needs.

Best suited for

What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.

  • Kubota F2690E — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 60-inch deck
  • Walker Walker Model H24d — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 60-inch deck
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
  1. F2690E uses a Kubota D1105 engine; Walker Model H24d uses a Rehlko engine. The engine maker builds the engine; the mower maker chooses the model, rating and fit, so the badge alone does not settle output or longevity.
  2. F2690E weighs 1,594 lbs (723 kg); Walker Model H24d weighs 997 lbs (452.2 kg), a 597 lbs difference. Operating weight bears on trailer payload, ramps and soft turf. On its own it says nothing about build quality. What F2690E's weight means for a trailer ›
  3. F2690E holds 16.1 gal (61 L) of fuel; Walker Model H24d holds 9.4 gal (35.6 L) of fuel, a 6.7 gal difference. Tank size bounds how long a machine runs between stops. Consumption varies with engine, load and speed, so hours per tank are not fixed.
  4. F2690E has a published top speed of 12.5 mph; Walker Model H24d has a published top speed of 10 mph, a 2.5 mph difference. Top speed is the maker's maximum in transport. Mowing speed is lower and depends on grass, terrain and the deck.
  5. F2690E has a 25.5 hp engine; Walker Model H24d has a 23.7 hp engine, a 1.8 hp difference. Published horsepower is the maker's rating at a stated engine speed. It is a different measure from displacement, and two engines of equal rating can pull differently.
1 more difference, calculated figures and what isn’t comparable

Other verified differences

  • F2690E has a 68.6 ci (1,124 cc) engine; Walker Model H24d has a 62.7 ci (1,028 cc) engine, a 5.9 ci difference.

Calculated by MowerFacts

  • F2690E works out to 6.1 acres/hour; Walker Model H24d works out to 4.8 acres/hour, a 1.2 acres/hour difference. Calculated by MowerFacts from deck width and the published top speed at 80% efficiency; it is not a manufacturer figure, and real mowing is slower.

Not comparable

  • Drive System: not published for Walker Model H24d.
  • Cut height range: not published for F2690E.

Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.

Which is faster on your property? › Measure your lawn once and MowerFacts times all 2 against it.

Add another (2 more fit): every commercial mower · more Kubota · more Walker
Side-by-side specifications: Kubota F2690E vs Walker Walker Model H24d
Spec F2690E
Kubota · Commercial
Walker Model H24d
Walker · Commercial
List price dealer quotedealer quote
Engine
Power Source diesel diesel
Engine Make Kubota D1105 Rehlko
Displacement 68.6 ci (1124 cc) 62.7 ci (1028 cc)
Engine Power 25.5 hp 23.7 hp
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel (2-D)
Deck
Cutting Width 60 in (1524 mm) 60 in (1524 mm)
Min Cut Height — 1 in (25 mm)
Max Cut Height — 5 in (127 mm)
Drive
Transmission Kubota HST Dual Independent Hydro-Gear ZT3400 Integrated Transaxles
Ground Speed 12.5 mph 10 mph
Drive System Shaft —
Dimensions
Weight 1594 lbs (723 kg) 997 lbs (452.2 kg)
Fuel Capacity 16.1 gal (61 L) 9.4 gal (35.6 L)

F2690E: Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — kubotausa.com.

Walker Model H24d: Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — walker.com.

Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.

Suggest a correction