MowerFacts
Home › Compare › Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) vs ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145)

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) vs Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145)

A side-by-side spec reference for two commercial machines. Where computed productivity separates them, the faster machine is marked a Data Pick with the arithmetic shown — the tables lay out each model's stated specs so you can match a machine to your property and routes.

A side-by-side for the commercial mower Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) and the zero-turn mower Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145). Open the full spec table in the compare tool ›

Best suited for

What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.

  • Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 72-inch deck
  • Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 72-inch deck
What’s different? The 5 differences that matter most, from the published figures.
  1. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) uses a Kawasaki FX921V engine; ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) uses a Vanguard® BIG BLOCK™ EFI ETC with Oil Guard engine. The engine maker builds the engine; the mower maker chooses the model, rating and fit, so the badge alone does not settle output or longevity.
  2. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) has a 31 hp engine; ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) has a 40 hp engine, a 9 hp difference. Published horsepower is the maker's rating at a stated engine speed. It is a different measure from displacement, and two engines of equal rating can pull differently.
  3. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) has a 10-gauge top, 7-gauge side skirt steel deck; ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) has a iCD™+ Cutting System, 2-Belt deck.
  4. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) weighs 1,304 lbs (591.5 kg); ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) weighs 1,717 lbs (778.8 kg), a 413 lbs difference. Operating weight bears on trailer payload, ramps and soft turf. On its own it says nothing about build quality. What Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921)'s weight means for a trailer ›
  5. Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) cuts from 1 in (25 mm) to 5.5 in (140 mm); ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) cuts from 1.5 in (38 mm) to 5 in (127 mm). The cut-height range is the shortest and tallest cut the deck offers. Most lawns are kept well inside it.
3 more differences

Other verified differences

  • Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) holds 12 gal (45.4 L) of fuel; ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) holds 11 gal (41.6 L) of fuel, a 1 gal difference.
  • Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) lists at $19,899; ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) lists at $20,899, a $1,000 difference.
  • Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) has a published top speed of 11.5 mph; ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) has a published top speed of 12 mph, a 0.5 mph difference.

Verified means each manufacturer publishes the figure. A bigger number is only a bigger number; nothing here says which machine is better. The full specification table is below.

Productivity

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) vs Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) — productivity
MeasureLazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921)ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145)
Cutting deck72 in72 in
Ground speed11.5 mph12 mph
Acres/hr (80%)4.684.89
Acres/hr (100%)8.368.73
List price $19,899 $20,899

Acres/hour computed from deck width and ground speed; 80% accounts for turns, overlap and trimming. Calculator ›

Components

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) vs Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) — components
ComponentLazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921)ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145)
Engine makeKawasaki FX921VVanguard® BIG BLOCK™ EFI ETC with Oil Guard
Displacement999 cc993 cc
Engine power31 hp40 hp
Transmissionnot specified by manufacturerDual commercial Hydro-Gear® ZT-5400 Powertrain® Transaxles with 9" cooling fans
Drive typenot specified by manufacturernot specified by manufacturer

Ownership & dimensions

Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) vs Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) — ownership and dimensions
SpecLazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921)ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145)
Weight591.48 kg778.82 kg
Fuel capacity45.42 L41.64 L
Warrantynot specified by manufacturer2
Dimensions (L×W×H mm) 2187 × 2156 × 1791 2146 × not specified by manufacturer × not specified by manufacturer

Dealer network and dimensions not in our data are shown as "not specified by manufacturer." See the full spec sheet on each model page.

Alternatives to cross-shop

FAQ

Is the Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) or the Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) better?

MowerFacts is a spec reference, not a review — we don't crown a winner. The Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) and Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) are both commercial machines with their own deck widths, engines and dimensions; the tables below lay out each spec side by side so you can match a machine to your property and routes.

How many acres per hour can the Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) and Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) mow?

At 80% efficiency the Exmark Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921) (72-in deck at 11.5 mph) covers about 4.68 acres/hour and the Ferris ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145) (72-in deck at 12 mph) about 4.89 acres/hour, before trimming and trailering time.

← All pro head-to-heads · Full spec comparison →

Lazer Z X-Series (LRX 72 in 921): Specs verified against the retailer listing on Jun 6, 2026 — altmantractor.com.

ISX 3300 Zero Turn Mowers (72 in / 5902145): Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — ferrismowers.com.

Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.

Suggest a correction