MowerFacts
Home › Compare › Bad Boy Mowers vs Scag

Bad Boy Mowers vs Scag Mowers

An objective, spec-based comparison of Bad Boy Mowers and Scag. On MowerFacts, Bad Boy Mowers has 38 models cataloged and Scag has 22. Below: each brand's lineup, representative models, and a head-to-head spec sheet of a comparable model from each.

Bad Boy Mowers

Representative models

Renegade Gas Bad Boy Mowers
Rebel X Bad Boy Mowers
Rebel Bad Boy Mowers

All 38 Bad Boy Mowers mowers — pick any to compare

Scag

Representative models

Turf Tiger II Scag
V-Ride XL Scag
V-Ride LS Scag
V-Ride II Scag

All 22 Scag mowers — pick any to compare

How the two lineups compare

Medians across every cataloged model, plus the suppliers each brand fits. Manufacturers publish this brand by brand; this puts the two side by side.

Bad Boy Mowers and Scag lineups compared on deck, speed, productivity, weight, price and components
MeasureBad Boy MowersScag
Models cataloged1919
Median deck 51 in 42 in
Median ground speed 9 mph 7 mph
Median acres/hour 2.441.51
Median weight 908 lb 730 lb
List price (median) dealer quote $8,524 (18 priced)
Price range — $1,699–$57,900
Engines fitted Kawasaki (10), Kohler (5), Perkins (1), Briggs (1) Kawasaki (9), Kohler (4), Vanguard (2), Briggs & Stratton (2)
Transmissions Hydro-Gear 16Cc Pump; Parker 18Ci Wheel Motors (3), Dual Hydro Gear Zt2200 (1), 5400 Hydro-Gear 16Cc Integrated Transaxle (1) Gt Mg 512 Transmission, 3-Speed (1)
Power 16 gas, 1 diesel, 1 battery 18 gas, 1 diesel

Medians describe the lineup, not any one machine — a brand with more commercial models will show a wider median deck. Blank means the manufacturer doesn’t publish it.

Head-to-head: Revolt (Stand-On) vs RC Extreme Slope Mower

A comparable commercial model from each brand, side by side. MowerFacts presents the stated specs neutrally and does not rank one brand above the other. Open in the full compare tool ›

Best suited for

What each model is built for, from its duty class and key specs. This is a neutral reference — MowerFacts does not rank one model above another.

  • Bad Boy Mowers Revolt (Stand-On) — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 36-inch deck; gas powered
  • Scag RC Extreme Slope Mower — commercial: daily paid use and high acreage; 52-inch deck; gas powered
Bad Boy Mowers Revolt (Stand-On) vs Scag RC Extreme Slope Mower specifications
Spec Revolt (Stand-On)
Bad Boy Mowers
RC Extreme Slope Mower
Scag
Engine
Power Source gas gas
Engine Make Kawasaki Vanguard BIG BLOCK™ V-Twin EFI engine with ETC with Oil Guard
Displacement 44.3 ci (726 cc) 60.6 ci (993 cc)
Engine Power 22 hp 37 hp
Deck
Cutting Width 36 in (914 mm) 52 in (1321 mm)
Deck Material 3/16" or 7-Gauge Thick Solid Steel —
Deck Gauge 7 —
Min Cut Height 2 in (51 mm) 3.5 in (89 mm)
Max Cut Height 5 in (127 mm) 11.5 in (292 mm)
Drive
Transmission 36" - 3100 Hydro-Gear® 10cc Integrated Transaxle48"/54"/61" - 3400 Hydro-Gear® 12cc Integrated Transaxle —
Ground Speed 9 mph 3 mph
Drive System — Electric Drive (No PTO)
Dimensions
Weight 805 lbs (365.1 kg) 2400 lbs (1088.6 kg)
Fuel Capacity 6.5 gal (24.6 L) —
Length — 75.4 in (1915 mm)
Width — 70 in (1778 mm)

Specific model comparisons

Bad Boy Mowers vs Scag — FAQ

Is Bad Boy Mowers better than Scag?

MowerFacts is a reference, not a review — we don't rank one brand above the other. Both Bad Boy Mowers and Scag build comparable machines; compare the spec sheets side by side to see how a given pair differs and decide what fits your needs.

What types of mowers do Bad Boy Mowers and Scag make?

On MowerFacts, Bad Boy Mowers has 38 models cataloged and Scag has 22, spanning Push / Walk-Behind, Zero-Turn, Commercial (Bad Boy Mowers) and Push / Walk-Behind, Zero-Turn, Commercial (Scag).

← All brand-vs-brand comparisons

Specs verified against the retailer listing on Jun 6, 2026 — foards.com.

Specs verified against the manufacturer spec sheet on Jun 6, 2026 — scag.com.

Independent reference database. Specs compiled from manufacturer sources and normalized for comparison; verify with the manufacturer or dealer before purchase.

Suggest a correction